Upheaval, Collapse and Change
A Month of Military Defeats and Political Upheaval
The period of September 1918 was a time of significant upheaval and transformation across Europe and Russia, as the First World War neared its conclusion and the Russian Civil War intensified.
This article explores a variety of key events and developments that shaped this turbulent period.
It covers pivotal military engagements, such as the Battle of Saint-Mihiel and the Vardar Offensive, which altered the course of the war and contributed to the collapse of the Central Powers.
The political landscape was equally volatile, with significant occurrences like the establishment of the Revolutionary Military Council in Soviet Russia, the brutal Red Terror campaign, and the massacres in Baku.
'We Will Win', Russian Civil War propaganda poster, 1918.
The wreck of a German tank, which was destroyed during a battle on the Western Front. By September 1918, Germany was on the brink of defeat in the First World War. The Allies' Hundred Days Offensive had pushed German forces back on the Western Front. The Hindenburg Line, Germany’s main defensive position, was crumbling under relentless attacks. Morale among soldiers and civilians was collapsing due to food shortages and economic strain. The German High Command, realizing the war was lost, sought an armistice, while unrest at home foreshadowed the revolution that would soon end the monarchy.
https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/first-world-war-color-photos/
...the tragic massacre of Armenians...
A young Adolf Hitler, future Fuhrer of Germany, narrowly escaped death during the First World War.
In addition, the article delves into the suffering and struggles faced by smaller nations, including the tragic massacre of Armenians in Baku and Bulgaria’s desperate exit from the war, marked by the signing of an armistice with the Allies.
Figures such as Leon Trotsky, General Allenby, and Private Henry Tandey, who reportedly spared Adolf Hitler during the First World War, are also mentioned.
The events of September 1918 had far-reaching implications, not only for the immediate outcome of the First World War but also for the social and political dynamics in the years that followed, setting the stage for the shaping of new national boundaries and ideologies in the post-war era.
Bulgarian soldiers during the First World War. In September 1918, Bulgaria faced a turning point in World War I as its forces suffered a decisive defeat in the Vardar Offensive against the Allies. The loss led to the collapse of the Bulgarian front, widespread unrest, and the abdication of Tsar Ferdinand. On the 29th September, Bulgaria signed the Armistice of Salonica, exiting the war.
https://www.warhats.com/store/p1301/WW1-Bulgarian-Army-Officer-Enlisted-and-NCO-Cap.html#/
Revolutionary Military Council of Soviet Russia was established, 2nd September 1918
The Revolutionary Military Council (Russian: Революционный Военный Совет, romanized: Revolyutsionny Voyenny Sovyet, lit. 'Revolutionary Military Council'), often referred to as the Revolutionary War Council or Revvoyensoviet (Реввоенсовет), served as the supreme military authority of Soviet Russia and later the Soviet Union.
Established on the 2nd September 1918, by decree of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (VTsIK), it was created under the "Decree Declaring the Soviet Republic a Military Camp."
This marked a critical step in consolidating military control during the turbulent years following the Russian Revolution.
Vladimir Lenin (center) and Communist Party Executive Committee Chairman Yakov Sverdlov (left) on Revolution Square in Moscow, November 1918. The Revolutionary Military Council, established in 1918, was crucial in consolidating Bolshevik control after the Russian Revolution. Led by Leon Trotsky, it directed the Red Army during the Civil War. Its success ensured Bolshevik dominance, suppressing opposition and shaping the Soviet military structure for future conflicts, including the Second World War.
...placing all military fronts and organizations under its authority...
Bolshevik propaganda poster: 'Year of the Red Army, 1918-1919'. The Revolutionary Military Council, led by Leon Trotsky, transformed the Red Army into a disciplined, centralized force during the Russian Civil War. It introduced strict hierarchy, political commissars, and mass mobilization, ensuring Bolshevik victory and shaping Soviet military doctrine for decades.
Before the creation of Revvoyensoviet, military authority was divided between the Supreme Military Council (Vysshy voyenny sovyet) and the operations division of the People's Commissariat on War and Navy Affairs.
The decree establishing Revvoyensoviet centralized command, placing all military fronts and organizations under its authority.
The chairman of Revvoyensoviet, who also served as the People's Commissar (Narkom) of War and Navy Affairs, was its chief decision-maker, supported by a commander-in-chief responsible for strategic and operational leadership.
In 1918, Leon Trotsky, as Commissar of War, led the Revolutionary Military Council, transforming the Red Army into a disciplined force during the Russian Civil War. He enforced strict discipline, utilized former Tsarist officers, and implemented harsh measures like the Red Terror to ensure Bolshevik control, securing Soviet Russia’s survival.
...the council played a pivotal role...
Leon Trotsky, one of the key architects of the Red Army, was appointed the first chairman of Revvoyensoviet.
His initial commander-in-chief, Jukums Vācietis, a Latvian rifleman, was succeeded in 1919 by Sergei Kamenev, who held the role until 1924.
Under their leadership, the council played a pivotal role in organizing and directing Soviet military efforts during the Russian Civil War.
On November 30, 1918, the Council of Labour and Defense was formed to streamline resource mobilization for defense.
Chaired by Lenin, its members included Trotsky, Joseph Stalin (representing VTsIK), and other narkoms.
Revvoyensoviet continued to function as the military's supreme authority until its dissolution in 1934, as part of broader Soviet administrative restructuring.
Sergei Kamenev, commander-in-chief of the Revolutionary Military Council (1919 - 1924)
Soviet troops n the march, 20th August 1945. The Revolutionary Military Council (RMC), established in 1918, played a crucial role in shaping the Red Army’s structure, discipline, and strategic effectiveness, which contributed to its success in the Second World War. Under leaders like Leon Trotsky, the RMC enforced strict organization, centralized command, and ideological loyalty, ensuring a well-coordinated military force. It also promoted mass conscription, modernized tactics, and emphasized political education, creating a resilient army. These foundations enabled the Soviet Union to withstand and ultimately defeat Nazi Germany.
Bolsheviks announce the Red Terror, 3rd September 1918
On the 3rd September 1918, the Bolshevik government of Soviet Russia officially announced the beginning of the Red Terror, a campaign of severe repression and violence aimed at eliminating political opponents and consolidating Bolshevik power.
The announcement, published in the government newspaper Izvestia as an "Appeal to the Working Class," marked the start of a systematic effort to suppress counter-revolutionary activity and dissent.
This declaration followed escalating tensions and acts of political violence during the Russian Civil War, with the Bolsheviks framing the campaign as a necessary measure to safeguard the revolution against internal and external threats.
First issue of journal Krasny Terror (Red Terror) with an article by Martin Latsis justifying the Red Terror.
Vladimir Lenin addresses the crowd at the Finland Station, Petrograd, 1917. Lenin played a central role in the Red Terror, justifying it as a necessary measure to eliminate counter-revolutionaries and secure Bolshevik rule. He directly ordered mass executions, suppression of political opponents, and the expansion of the Cheka’s authority. Lenin’s rhetoric encouraged extreme violence, calling for "merciless" repression against enemies of the revolution. His leadership during the Red Terror laid the foundation for the Soviet state’s reliance on political repression, shaping the trajectory of Soviet governance.
...attempted to assassinate Vladimir Lenin...
One of the first prominent victims of the Red Terror was Fanny Kaplan, a member of the Socialist Revolutionary Party.
Just days earlier, on August 30, 1918, Kaplan had attempted to assassinate Vladimir Lenin, shooting and severely wounding him as he left a factory meeting in Moscow.
Kaplan reportedly viewed Lenin as a "traitor to the Revolution," blaming him and the Bolshevik leadership for betraying the ideals of the broader revolutionary movement.
Following her arrest, Kaplan was interrogated and, on the 2rd September, swiftly executed without trial.
Her death symbolized the Bolsheviks’ uncompromising stance toward political rivals and marked a turning point in the intensification of state-led violence.
Vladimir Pchelin's 1927 depiction of Fanny Kaplan's assassination attempt on Vladimir Lenin. Kaplan's assassination attempt on Lenin on August 30, 1918, was a pivotal event that directly triggered the Red Terror. Following the attack, Bolshevik leaders launched a campaign of mass arrests, executions, and political repression to eliminate perceived enemies and consolidate power. The attempt on Lenin's life justified the escalation of violence against counter-revolutionaries, intensifying state-sanctioned terror. This marked a turning point in Soviet policy, solidifying Bolshevik authority through fear and the suppression of dissent.
...involved mass arrests, executions, and imprisonment...
The Red Terror, overseen by the Bolshevik secret police, the Cheka, involved mass arrests, executions, and imprisonment of suspected counter-revolutionaries, including former tsarist officials, members of rival socialist factions, intellectuals, and other perceived enemies of the state.
The campaign was justified by Bolshevik leaders, including Lenin, as a necessary tool for the survival of the revolution.
However, it also entrenched a culture of fear and repression that would come to define Soviet governance in the years that followed.
Bolsheviks armed with guns ride in a truck in Vladivostok, Russia, in 1920. Led by Vladimir Lenin, the left-wing Bolshevik regime sought to silence its enemies through a state-sanctioned policy of mass killings and detainments known as the Red Terror.
Photograph by Cody Marsh, Nat Geo Image Collection
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/red-terror-set-macabre-course-soviet-union
...a hub of torture and summary executions...
A Soviet poster showing a worker clearing the land of criminals. 1923. The Bolsheviks justified the Red Terror as a necessary measure to protect the revolution, suppress counter-revolutionaries, and eliminate class enemies, claiming it ensured the survival of Soviet power against internal and external threats.
British Library (C.191.a.13).
https://communistcrimes.org/en/violence-and-terror-russian-revolution
The brutality of the Red Terror was exemplified in the ruthless methods employed by the Cheka, which carried out mass executions without trials, often executing prisoners in basements or secluded areas.
Victims included Grand Duke Nicholas Mikhailovich, a prominent historian and Romanov family member executed by the Cheka in Petrograd, and Metropolitan Vladimir of Kiev, a high-ranking Orthodox Church leader murdered for his opposition to Bolshevik policies.
In Petrograd, hundreds of prisoners were drowned in the Neva River, while in Moscow, the infamous Butyrka prison became a hub of torture and summary executions.
The scale of violence, indiscriminate arrests, and sheer terror left an indelible mark on Soviet society, demonstrating the lengths to which the Bolsheviks were willing to go to maintain power.
“In the basement of the Cheka.” Painting by Ivan Vladimirov, 1919. The Cheka, the Bolshevik secret police, led the Red Terror, executing thousands of suspected counter-revolutionaries without trial. They targeted tsarist officials, clergy, intellectuals, and political opponents, using torture, mass shootings, and forced labor camps. Their ruthless repression solidified Bolshevik rule and instilled fear across Soviet Russia.
https://oercommons.org/courseware/lesson/87984/student-old/?task=2
Battle of Saint-Mihiel, 12th – 15th September 1918
The Battle of Saint-Mihiel, fought from the 12th - 15th September 1918, was a pivotal engagement during the First World War and marked the first major offensive led solely by the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) under General John J. Pershing.
This battle, occurring in northeastern France near the town of Saint-Mihiel, was part of a broader Allied effort to push German forces out of fortified positions and hasten the end of the war.
For nearly four years, German troops had occupied the Saint-Mihiel salient, a bulge in the front line that posed a significant threat to Allied communications and transportation routes.
The salient's capture was strategically crucial, as its elimination would improve the Allies' ability to coordinate movements along the Western Front and pave the way for further offensives.
The American-led operation began on September 12 with a massive artillery bombardment, followed by an assault involving over 500,000 American troops, supported by French forces and tanks under the command of Colonel George S. Patton.
John Joseph "Black Jack" Pershing. (1860–1948) was a U.S. Army general who led the American Expeditionary Forces during the First World War, playing a key role in securing Allied victory on the Western Front.
The Battle of Saint-Mihiel (12th - 15th September 1918) was the first major independent U.S. offensive in the First World War, led by General John J. Pershing. American and French forces successfully attacked German positions in northeastern France, capturing strategic territory and weakening German defenses, demonstrating U.S. military strength on the Western Front.
https://ww1ha.wordpress.com/2014/02/14/fightin-friday-mon-plaisir-farm/
...were caught off guard by the scale and intensity of the attack...
The Omaha Daily Bee newspaper, Omaha, Nebraska, 14th September 1918
The Allies advanced swiftly, aided by poor weather that hampered German reconnaissance. The Germans, already in the process of a planned withdrawal from the salient, were caught off guard by the scale and intensity of the attack.
By the 15th September, the AEF had successfully secured the salient, capturing over 15,000 German soldiers, more than 400 artillery pieces, and liberating the region.
The victory demonstrated the growing strength and effectiveness of American forces and bolstered Allied morale.
It also solidified General Pershing's reputation as a capable commander. The Battle of Saint-Mihiel was a significant precursor to the Meuse-Argonne Offensive, the largest and final Allied campaign of the war.
It underscored the importance of American involvement in tipping the balance on the Western Front and contributed to the eventual Allied victory in November 1918.
American engineers marching though the village of Nonsard-Lamarche during the Battle of St. Mihiel. The Battle of Saint-Mihiel was a pivotal moment for the U.S. military, marking its first independent offensive in World War I under General John J. Pershing. The success showcased American tactical capabilities and validated the need for a well-coordinated, modernized army. Lessons learned influenced U.S. military doctrine, leading to advancements in mechanization, air support, and combined arms tactics during the 1920s and 1930s. This experience helped shape U.S. military preparedness for future global conflicts, including the Second World War.
September Days Massacre, 14th – 16th September 1918
The "September Days" of 1918 marked a tragic massacre of Armenians in Baku, taking place from the 14th to 16th September 1918.
This event unfolded in the chaotic aftermath of World War I and the Russian Civil War, as political and ethnic tensions in the South Caucasus reached their peak.
Following the capture of Baku by the Ottoman-backed Azerbaijani Army of Islam, led by Nuri Pasha, thousands of Armenians were killed in one of the most harrowing episodes of the era.
Baku, a multi-ethnic city and a key oil hub, had been a battleground for control between various factions, including Bolsheviks, Armenian forces, Azerbaijani nationalists, and Ottoman troops.
Prior to the September Days, tensions were exacerbated by the March Days of 1918, when Bolshevik and Armenian forces fought against Azerbaijani and Muslim residents of Baku, resulting in significant casualties among Muslims.
The events of March left deep grievances among the Azerbaijani and Muslim populations, fueling desires for revenge.
Excerpt from the newspaper "Mer-Orer" published in Baku, December 1918, reflecting on the events in September.
A group of ethnic Armenian children in today's Istanbul, Turkey, was taken by French photographer Stephane Passet in September 1912. In the early 1900s, ethnic Armenians faced persecution, war, and displacement. Under the Ottoman Empire, they suffered the Armenian Genocide (1915–1917), where 1.5 million were killed or deported. Many fled to the Caucasus, but conflict followed. In September 1918, during the September Days Massacre in Baku, thousands of Armenians were killed by Ottoman-backed Azerbaijani forces in retaliation for earlier violence. Ethnic tensions with Azerbaijanis over territories like Karabakh and Nakhchivan led to further clashes. Despite persecution and massacres, Armenians rebuilt their communities, forming a newly independent Armenia in 1918, though their struggles for security and stability persisted.
https://www.rferl.org/a/armenians-ottoman-turkey-color-photos/32172786.html
Baku, location of the massacre. In 1918, Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, was a crucial port city on the Caspian Sea, rich in oil reserves. It featured a blend of European and Oriental architecture, with industrial zones near oil fields. The city was contested during the First World War and the Russian Civil War, shaping its political landscape.
...violence erupted against the Armenian population...
In September 1918, the Army of Islam launched a successful offensive against the Baku Soviet, forcing the withdrawal of Bolshevik and Armenian forces.
As Azerbaijani and Ottoman forces entered the city, large-scale violence erupted against the Armenian population.
Civilians were indiscriminately targeted, with thousands killed, homes looted, and properties destroyed.
Estimates of the death toll range from 10,000 to 20,000.
Ottoman troops, pictured here waiting by trains leaving for the Galicia Front in 1917. A year later the September Days Massacre occurred in Baku, where Azerbaijani Muslims were massacred by Armenian and Bolshevik forces after the Baku Commune’s fall. Ottoman forces, supporting the Azerbaijanis, entered Baku shortly after, defeating the defenders. Their arrival ended the killings but also led to further violence against Armenians in retaliation.
...driven by ethnic hatred...
The massacre was driven by ethnic hatred, political rivalries, and the desire to reassert Azerbaijani control over Baku.
It left a lasting scar on the region, further deepening the animosities between Armenians and Azerbaijanis.
The "September Days" remain a dark chapter in the history of the South Caucasus, symbolizing the devastating consequences of war, nationalism, and interethnic conflict during this turbulent period.
In 1918, relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan were highly volatile due to territorial disputes and ethnic conflicts. The fall of the Russian Empire left both nations struggling for control over regions like Karabakh, Nakhchivan, and Zangezur. Clashes escalated into massacres, including the September Days Massacre in Baku. The Ottoman-backed Azerbaijani forces and Armenian militias engaged in brutal violence. The hostility persisted as both nations declared independence, setting the stage for continued conflicts in the coming decades.
Vardar Offensive and Treaty of Salonica, 15th – 29th September 1918
The Vardar Offensive, launched in September 1918, was a decisive military campaign on the Balkan Front during the First World War that led to the collapse of the Central Powers in the region.
It marked the culmination of efforts by the Allied Army of the Orient to break through entrenched Bulgarian and German positions along the Macedonian front and forced Bulgaria to seek an armistice, dramatically altering the course of the war in the Balkans.
The offensive began on September 14, 1918, spearheaded by a multinational Allied force under the command of French General Louis Franchet d’Espèrey.
The army included French, British, Serbian, Greek, and Italian troops, who faced a heavily fortified Bulgarian-German defensive line along the Vardar River and Dobro Pole.
French General Louis Franchet d'Espèrey led the Allied forces during the Vardar Offensive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Franchet_d%27Esp%C3%A8rey
A Bulgarian telephone station with trench periscope observing the enemy's position at the Doiran front, March 1917. The Vardar Offensive was a decisive Allied attack on the Macedonian Front during the First World War. Led by French and Serbian forces, it broke through Bulgarian lines, forcing Bulgaria’s surrender. This victory accelerated the collapse of the Central Powers in the Balkans, leading to the war’s end soon after.
...overwhelming the enemy with a concentrated assault...
The Allies' strategy focused on overwhelming the enemy with a concentrated assault at key points, particularly at Dobro Pole, a critical Bulgarian defensive stronghold.
Following a massive artillery bombardment, the Allies launched their attack. Serbian troops played a pivotal role, advancing through the rugged terrain of Dobro Pole and breaking through enemy lines on the 15th September.
The success at Dobro Pole created a cascading effect, with Bulgarian forces retreating in disarray and opening gaps in the Central Powers’ defensive network.
The Allies pressed their advantage, advancing rapidly into the Vardar River valley and capturing strategic points, including Prilep and Skopje.
Map of the Vardar Offensive, September 1918. This map, from the British Official History of the Macedonian Campaign (Vol. 2) published in 1935 (but reprinted in various editions since), shows the planned allied assaults; that by the First and Second Serbian Armies on 15 September and the later secondary attacks, including those by British and Greek forces at Doiran.
The Vardar Offensive was meticulously planned by the Allies to break the Bulgarian defensive lines in Macedonia. Coordinated by French General Franchet d’Espèrey, it involved Serbian, French, British, Greek, and Italian forces. Careful deception tactics, artillery barrages, and concentrated assaults aimed to exploit Bulgarian weaknesses, ensuring a swift and decisive breakthrough.
...began to disintegrate....
The Bulgarian army, demoralized and overwhelmed, began to disintegrate. Facing imminent defeat, Bulgaria would eventually sign an armistice with the Allies later in the month, effectively ending its involvement in the war.
(The armistice terms remained valid until Bulgaria and the Allies signed the Treaty of Neuilly-sur-Seine on the 27th November 1919..)
The Vardar Offensive not only liberated Serbian territory but also destabilized the Central Powers’ southern flank, hastening the broader collapse of Austria-Hungary and Germany.
It was a turning point that underscored the strategic importance of the Balkan Front in the First World War.
British infantrymen guarding Bulgarian prisoners of war taken during the Anglo-French attack at Doiran, August 1916. The Vardar Offensive, launched in September 1918, was a decisive Allied attack that shattered Bulgarian defenses in Macedonia. The breakthrough at Dobro Pole forced a rapid Bulgarian retreat, leading to the Battle of Doiran, where British and Greek forces clashed with Bulgarian troops. Despite stiff resistance, Bulgaria’s lines collapsed, triggering widespread mutinies and desertions. Facing internal unrest and Allied advances, Bulgaria would eventually sign the Armistice of Salonica on the 29th September, marking its exit from the First World War.
Establishment of the Order of the Red Banner, 16th September 1918
The Order of the Red Banner, established on September 16, 1918, by the Soviet government, was created to recognize distinguished military service and acts of bravery, especially during the turbulent years of the Civil War.
Soviet army officer Vasily Blyukher was the first recipient of the prestigious medalr, an award that would be granted to him four more times throughout his career.
Blyukher received this honor for his leadership and military achievements during the Russian Civil War, particularly his significant role in combating the White Army, which sought to overthrow the Bolshevik government.
Order of the Red Flag, Soviet Union. Awarded for military merit.
Red Army soldiers in 1919, during the Russian Civil War. The Order of the Red Banner, (officially Order of the Red Banner of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR), was established in 1918, and was the Soviet Union’s highest military decoration during the Russian Civil War. It recognized exceptional bravery and leadership in battles against White Army forces and foreign interventionists. Many Red Army commanders, including Vasily Blyukher and Semyon Budyonny, received this prestigious award.
...a symbol of the Soviet Union's military power...
REd army Commander Vasily Blyukher. In September 1918, he became the first recipient of the Order of the Red Banner (later he was awarded it four more times: twice in 1921 and twice in 1928).
The Order itself was a symbol of the Soviet Union's military power and ideological commitment to the success of the Bolshevik cause.
Its design featured a red banner with the hammer and sickle, representing the union of workers and peasants and the victory of socialism.
The award was not only a recognition of individual acts of heroism but also a powerful propaganda tool, helping to inspire soldiers and reinforce Soviet ideals during a period of intense conflict.
The Order of the Red Banner was initially awarded for outstanding military performance during the Civil War, where it played a key role in motivating Red Army troops fighting against internal enemies like the White movement and external threats such as foreign intervention.
An original citation describing the reasons for the granting of the Order of the Red Banner to its recipient.
...awarded both to individuals and entire military units...
It was awarded both to individuals and entire military units, with many recipients recognized for their leadership, battlefield successes, and dedication to the Soviet cause.
During the Second World War, the Order of the Red Banner became one of the most prestigious decorations in the Soviet Union.
It was awarded to generals, officers, and soldiers for extraordinary feats during critical battles, such as the Battle of Stalingrad, the Siege of Leningrad, and the Battle of Kursk.
Unnamed Soviet Solder, recipient of Order of the Red Banner #153643 (Photo enhanced from original, low-quality original)
Soviet Red Army soldiers during the Battle of Stalingrad in the Second World War. The Order of the Red Banner, a prestigious Soviet military award, was frequently bestowed upon units and individuals for exceptional bravery, including during the Battle of Stalingrad (1942-1943). Many Soviet divisions that withstood the brutal German assault and later encircled the enemy received this honor. The 62nd Army, led by General Vasily Chuikov, played a crucial role in the city’s defense. The battle’s victory marked a turning point in the Second World War, securing Soviet momentum on the Eastern Front.
...those that participated in pivotal campaigns...
1933 stamp marking the 15th anniversary of the Order of the Red Banner.
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Order_of_the_red_banner
Entire military units were also honored with the Order, including those that participated in pivotal campaigns that helped defeat Nazi Germany.
Through both world wars, the Order of the Red Banner was an enduring symbol of Soviet valor, resilience, and ideological commitment to the defense of the socialist state.
It reinforced the idea that victory came through collective effort and personal sacrifice, becoming a key part of the military traditions that persisted through the Soviet era.
USSR state awards ceremony for veterans of the Great Patriotic War. Mikhail Metkin is awarded the Order of the Red Banner and the Order of the Patriotic War 2nd class by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in 2005. The Order of the Red Banner remains relevant in Russia today as a symbol of military valor and Soviet heritage. Although discontinued, its legacy influences modern Russian military awards and traditions. Many Russian units retain honorary Red Banner titles, reflecting historical continuity and national pride in past military achievements.
Mid-European Union Established, 16th September 1918
The Mid-European Union was an intellectual and political initiative aimed at promoting cooperation among the newly independent nations of Central and Eastern Europe.
Its creation was driven by the desire to foster regional unity, ensure security, and strengthen the independence of smaller nations emerging from the collapse of empires like Austria-Hungary, Russia, and the Ottoman Empire.
The idea for the Mid-European Union emerged during the First World War, spearheaded by émigré leaders and intellectuals from Central and Eastern Europe who were exiled in the United States.
Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk was a leading advocate for Czechoslovak independence, played a crucial role in the Mid-European Union in 1918. He supported uniting oppressed nations to challenge imperial rule, promote self-determination, and influence the postwar reorganization of Central and Eastern Europe. He would later become the first President of the Republic of Czechoslovakia.
Ottoman troops wearing rudimentary gas masks during the First World War. The First World War devastated Central and Eastern Europe, exposing the oppression of nations under Austro-Hungarian and German rule. The war’s destruction, economic hardship, and national awakenings fueled demands for self-determination. In response, exiled leaders from oppressed nations formed the Mid-European Union in 1918, seeking independence and democratic governance. They signed the Declaration of Common Aims, inspired by the U.S. Declaration of Independence, advocating for national sovereignty. Though short-lived, the union influenced Europe’s postwar reorganization.
...brought together representatives from various ethnic groups...
US President, Woodrow Wilson, who during his presidency, proposed a "Mid-European Union" as part of his vision for post-First World War peace. He believed it would foster economic stability and cooperation among Central European nations, but the idea never fully developed or succeeded.
https://historycolored.com/articles/4565/photographs-of-every-us-president-in-color/
The Union’s foundation was formalized on 16th September 1918 at the Mid-European Union Congress held in Philadelphia, which brought together representatives from various ethnic groups, including Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians, Romanians, Ukrainians, Lithuanians, and others.
These representatives envisioned a united bloc of nations that could collaborate on political, economic, and cultural fronts while resisting domination by larger powers.
The Union’s primary goal was to advocate for the principle of self-determination, as championed by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson in his Fourteen Points.
Its members sought to create a framework for peaceful coexistence and mutual support, emphasizing shared interests over historical grievances.
A symbolic gesture of their vision was the signing of the Declaration of Common Aims in October 1918, which expressed solidarity among the emerging nations and a commitment to freedom and democracy.
Locals gaze at a map of Europe featuring the new countries that were to appear after the First World War. The Mid-European Union of 1918 was a coalition of oppressed Central and Eastern European nations seeking independence from empires. Their vision influenced post-First World War peace efforts. After 1918, Europe's map changed significantly, with new nations like Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia emerging from the collapse of Austro-Hungarian and German rule.
...made lasting unity difficult...
However, the practical implementation of the Union’s vision faced significant challenges. Territorial disputes, ethnic tensions, and competing national interests among its members made lasting unity difficult.
Additionally, the post-war treaties, particularly the Treaty of Versailles, created rigid national boundaries that limited cooperation.
Despite its short-lived influence, the Mid-European Union represented an early attempt to address the challenges of fragmentation and foster regional collaboration in a volatile period of history. Its legacy foreshadowed later efforts at European integration.
Europe in 1914 (left) and after the First World War (right). The new nations created in Europe after the conflict can clerly be seen. The Mid-European Union united oppressed nations seeking independence from collapsing empires. Advocating self-determination, it influenced the postwar redrawing of Europe's map. New states like Czechoslovakia, Poland, and Yugoslavia emerged, replacing Austro-Hungarian and German dominance, reshaping Central and Eastern Europe’s political landscape.
http://mrknighths.weebly.com/pre-and-post-world-war-1-map-comparison.html
Murder of Olli Kinkkonen, 18th September 1918
Olli (Olof) Kiukkonen Kinkkonen was a Finnish-American dockworker and logger lynched in Duluth, Minnesota, for renouncing his U.S. citizenship to avoid fighting in the First World War. His tragic death exemplified the vigilante violence and nationalist fervor of the time.
On the 11th September 1918, Kinkkonen, also known as Olli Wirta, and five others formally renounced their citizenship, refusing to participate in the war.
A week later, on the night of the 18th September, a mob, allegedly members of the Knights of Liberty, confronted Kinkkonen at his boarding house.
Pretending to be officials, they abducted him, interrogated him about his loyalty, and subjected him to a humiliating tarring-and-feathering in Congdon Park
The newspaper's use of the word 'slacker' mirroring views held by many of the US Population. Olli Kinkkonen’s murder reflected intense U.S. nationalism and hostility toward non-citizens during the First World War. Immigrants who opposed the war faced suspicion, violence, and accusations of disloyalty. Vigilante actions, like his lynching, underscored widespread xenophobia and the brutal enforcement of patriotic conformity during the wartime loyalty crackdown.
https://www.vets-hall.org/stories/not-available/olli-kinkkonen
...vigilantes claiming responsibility...
The next morning, local newspapers received anonymous calls from the vigilantes claiming responsibility, warning others who had renounced their citizenship to reconsider.
Kinkkonen was not seen alive after the incident. On the 30th September, his body was discovered hanging from a tree in Lester Park, outside Duluth.
Despite the circumstances, authorities ruled his death a suicide, attributing it to his shame over the attack.
However, many, including the socialist newspaper The Truth, accused the Knights of Liberty of murder and criticized Duluth authorities and Governor Joseph Burnquist for failing to take action against the perpetrators.
1918 German propaganda depicting an American "inquisition" by the 'Knights of Liberty' against pacifists. Also referred to as the Liberty Knights, Loyalty Knights, or Knights of Loyalty— they were an American nationalist secret society and vigilante group active around 1917–1918. Comprised of volunteers, the organization sought to suppress perceived disloyalty during the First World War through violent means. They are most infamous for orchestrating the 1917 Tulsa Outrage in Oklahoma, the 1918 lynching of Olli Kinkkonen in Minnesota, and a series of tarring and feathering attacks in Wisconsin and California.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_of_Liberty_(vigilante_group)
...buried in an unmarked grave...
Kinkkonen, described as an easy going man uninvolved in labor or anti-war movements, was buried in an unmarked grave in Duluth’s Park Hill Cemetery.
In 1993, the Finnish-American society Työmies placed a marker on his grave reading, “Olli Kinkkonen. 1881–1918. Victim of Warmongers.” His death reflects the intense nationalism and xenophobia of First World War-era America, a period marked by vigilante violence targeting those deemed disloyal.
Kinkkonen’s story has since inspired books, songs, and art, ensuring his memory endures as a symbol of injustice.
Grave of Olli Kinkkonen (1881-1918), lynched in Duluth, Minnesota. Grave located in Park Hill Cemetery, Duluth, section G, row 29, lot 15.
Photo taken by Pamela J. Erickson
Battle of Megiddo, 19th – 25th September 1918
The Battle of Megiddo, fought between the 19th and 25th September 1918, took place on the Plain of Sharon, spanning the areas near Tulkarm, Tabsor, Arara, and the Judean Hills, as well as the Esdralon Plain near Nazareth, Afulah, Beisan, Jenin, and Samakh.
While the battle’s name is tied to the biblical city of Megiddo, which holds symbolic significance, little of the fighting actually occurred near Tel Megiddo, making the name "perhaps misleading." British commander Edmund Allenby chose it for its historical resonance.
The Battle of Megiddo was the final major Allied offensive of the Sinai and Palestine Campaign during the First World War.
The forces involved included the Allied Egyptian Expeditionary Force, comprising three corps, one of which was mounted troops, and the Ottoman Yildirim Army Group, which fielded three armies, each roughly the size of an Allied corps.
Field Marshal Viscount Edmund Allenby. Allenby led British and Allied forces to victory in the Battle of Megiddo (1918) during the First World War. His innovative use of cavalry, aircraft, and rapid maneuvers crushed Ottoman forces, leading to the capture of Damascus and the Ottoman Empire’s eventual collapse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Allenby,_1st_Viscount_Allenb
A map of the battlefield. The Battle of Megiddo (1918), fought from 19-25 September, was a decisive Allied victory in the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of the First World War. Led by General Edmund Allenby, the Allied forces, including British, Indian, Australian, and New Zealand troops, overwhelmed the Ottoman Yildirim Army Group. The battle resulted in the capture of tens of thousands of Ottoman soldiers and significant territorial gains for the Allies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Megiddo_%281918%29
...which broke through Ottoman defensive lines...
The battle unfolded in the central and northern parts of Ottoman Palestine, covering parts of present-day Israel, Syria, and Jordan.
The offensive began with attacks by British and Indian infantry divisions, which broke through Ottoman defensive lines along the coast during the Battle of Sharon.
This success was made possible in part by the Arab Revolt, which distracted Ottoman forces by targeting their lines of communication.
The Desert Mounted Corps then exploited the breach, advancing rapidly to nearly encircle the Ottoman Seventh and Eighth Armies in the Judean Hills.
At the same time, the Battle of Nablus occurred in the Judean Hills, followed by attacks on the Ottoman Fourth Army in the Hills of Moab.
Ottoman prisoners after the battle. During the Battle of Megiddo (1918), Ottoman forces, under General Liman von Sanders, were overwhelmed by British and Allied troops. Poor communication, exhausted troops, and inadequate reinforcements left them vulnerable to rapid cavalry and aerial attacks. Their defensive lines collapsed, leading to mass retreats, heavy casualties, and eventual surrender.
https://history-maps.com/story/World-War-I/event/Battle-of-Megiddo
...captured significant territory...
The Allies captured significant territory and took tens of thousands of Ottoman prisoners.
After the battle, Daraa fell on the 27th September, Damascus was captured on the 1st October, and operations continued near Aleppo until the Armistice of Mudros was signed, ending hostilities.
General Allenby’s use of creeping barrages, coordinated infantry attacks, and mobile forces—including cavalry, armored cars, and aircraft—proved decisive in breaking the stalemate of trench warfare, while the Arab Revolt also contributed to the Allied success.
The opening paragraph of Allenby’s despatch forwarded to the War Office at the end of October 1918. By October 1918, the Battle of Megiddo had led to the complete collapse of Ottoman forces in Palestine and Syria. General Edmund Allenby’s rapid offensives captured key cities, including Damascus and Aleppo. The victory forced the Ottomans into retreat, contributing to their surrender and the war’s final stages.
https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/apocalypse-then-battle-megiddo-1918/
26 members of the Baku Soviet revolutionary group are executed, 20th September 1918
The 26 Baku Commissars were Bolshevik and Left Socialist Revolutionary members of the Baku Commune, which briefly governed Baku, the capital of present-day Azerbaijan, from April to July 1918.
Led by Stepan Shahumyan, the Commune emerged after the violent March Days clashes with the Muslim population.
Despite its brief existence, it introduced significant reforms, including oil industry nationalization, but struggled with food shortages and military threats from the advancing Ottoman forces.
The March Days Massacre (30th March – 2nd April, 1918) occurred when Bolshevik-led forces, allied with Armenian Dashnaks, brutally suppressed Azerbaijani Muslims in Baku, securing control of the city. This bloodshed deepened ethnic and political divisions, fueling resentment against Bolshevik rule. Months later, as Ottoman-backed Azerbaijani forces reclaimed Baku, the Bolshevik-led Baku Commune collapsed. Its leaders, the 26 Baku Commissars, were captured while fleeing and later executed by anti-Bolshevik forces, marking the Commune’s violent end.
...invited British forces to defend Baku...
Stepan Shahumyan, a Soviet-Armenian revolutionary and leader of the 26 commissars
On the 25th July 1918, Bolsheviks resigned after losing majority support to a coalition of Dashnaks, Right Socialist Revolutionaries, and Mensheviks, who invited British forces to defend Baku.
The Bolsheviks and their allies were arrested after the fall of the Commune.
In September 1918, as Ottoman forces seized Baku, Red Army soldiers freed the imprisoned commissars.
However, while attempting to escape by sea, their ship was diverted to Krasnovodsk, where local authorities arrested them.
In 1918, Baku was at the heart of geopolitical struggles, contested by Bolsheviks, Azerbaijani nationalists, Armenian Dashnaks, and foreign powers like Britain and the Ottoman Empire. The oil-rich city was strategically vital, fueling both regional ambitions and global conflicts. In March, Bolshevik-led forces, allied with Dashnaks, violently suppressed Azerbaijani Muslims in the March Days Massacre. However, by September, Ottoman-backed Azerbaijani forces seized Baku, leading to the collapse of the Baku Commune. As its leaders fled, 26 Baku Commissars were captured and later executed by anti-Bolshevik forces, marking the brutal culmination of Baku’s year of political turmoil and war.
...fueling tension between Britain and the Soviet Union...
On the night of September 20, 1918, 26 commissars, including Shahumyan, were executed near the Trans-Caspian Railway by soldiers of the Ashkhabad Committee, allegedly under Socialist Revolutionary leadership.
Controversy surrounds British involvement, as they were active in the region.
The British denied responsibility, but Soviet officials accused them of influencing the executions, fueling tension between Britain and the Soviet Union.
Isaak Brodsky’s The Execution of the Twenty Six Baku Commissars (1925) depicting the Soviet view of the execution..
https://milwaukeearmenians.com/2014/09/19/execution-of-the-26-baku-commissars/
...portraying them as martyrs...
Soviet historiography memorialized the commissars through art, films, and public works, portraying them as martyrs of the Revolution.
While Soviet claims often blamed British agents, later investigations highlighted internal complexities, including local authorities’ role.
The incident remains a poignant chapter in the early Soviet struggle and the broader conflicts of the Russian Civil War.
Soviet poster: "We will never forget the 26 murdered by British imperialists. 1918, September 20." By unknown artist. Baku, 1925. The Soviet view on the execution of the 26 Baku Commissars in 1918 framed them as martyrs of the Bolshevik Revolution, brutally killed by anti-Bolshevik forces. Soviet historians portrayed their deaths as a tragic betrayal, emphasizing their sacrifice for socialism and using their legacy to reinforce communist ideology and loyalty.
Provisional All-Russian Government elected in Ufa, 23rd September 1918
The Provisional All-Russian Government, commonly referred to as the Directory, the Ufa Directory, or the Omsk Directory, was a short-lived government that existed during the Russian Civil War.
It was formed on the 23rd September 1918, at the State Conference in Ufa, resulting from an unstable compromise between various anti-Communist forces in eastern Russia.
This government aimed to continue the Russian Provisional Government that had been overthrown during the October Revolution of 1917.
However, it lasted only two months before being dissolved after a coup that brought Admiral Alexander Kolchak to power in areas of eastern Russia that were free from Communist control.
In 1918, Ufa in Bashkortostan, Russia, was a key city in the Ural Mountains region, located along the Belaya River. It had a continental climate and served as a strategic hub during the Russian Civil War.
...cooperation between these two groups was difficult...
Admiral Alexander Kolchak was the Supreme Leader of Russia after the Provisional government was overthrown.
The Provisional All-Russian Government was composed of the Committee of Members of the Constituent Assembly, which included Socialist Revolutionaries and Kadets from Samara, and the Provisional Siberian Government, consisting of regional politicians and right-wing officers from Omsk.
However, cooperation between these two groups was difficult, marked by rivalry and conflicts such as customs wars and border disputes.
In November 1918, a military coup led by right-wing Kadets, Cossacks, and some Allied support ousted the Provisional Government.
Admiral Kolchak, who had briefly served as the Minister of War, was appointed Supreme Leader of Russia and given the task of forming a new government with no influence from the Socialist Revolutionaries.
...gained recognition from all White Russian factions...
Despite its challenges, the Provisional All-Russian Government gained recognition from all White Russian factions east of the Urals and established a unified foreign policy.
It retained support from Russia's former diplomatic missions abroad.
However, the Directory lacked a large administrative state, relying on the institutions of the Provisional Siberian Government in Omsk, where the Allied powers had also set up diplomatic and military offices.
First aircraft carrier landing in history, 24th September 1918
Richard Bell Davies, a British fighter pilot, made aviation history on the 24th September 1918, when he completed the first true aircraft carrier landing, landing a Sopwith biplane on the bare steel flight deck of the HMS Argus, a pioneering Royal Navy aircraft carrier.
This remarkable achievement marked a major milestone in the development of naval aviation and the future of aircraft carrier operations.
The HMS Argus was the world’s first ship designed from the ground up to operate as an aircraft carrier.
Unlike earlier makeshift carriers, which were converted ships, the Argus featured a full-length flight deck and was purpose-built to launch and recover aircraft.
Richard Bell Davies, a British pilot, achieved the first true aircraft carrier landing on HMS Argus in 1918, revolutionizing naval aviation and showcasing the potential of carrier-based operations.
...an incredibly difficult and dangerous manoeuvre...
At the time, landing an aircraft on a moving ship was considered an incredibly difficult and dangerous maneuver, and no aircraft had yet successfully landed on a carrier deck.
Bell Davies, a skilled and experienced pilot, was chosen to perform this daring task as part of a series of tests to determine the feasibility of carrier-based aviation.
The aircraft he flew, a Sopwith biplane, was a relatively slow and manoeuverable fighter that had proven effective in combat during the First World War.
Landing on the Argus's steel deck, however, required immense precision and skill. The lack of any landing aids, such as arrestor wires or landing lights, made the task even more challenging.
...a testament to his flying abilities...
Bell Davies' successful landing on the Argus was not only a testament to his flying abilities but also demonstrated the potential for aircraft carriers to play a crucial role in naval warfare.
His achievement paved the way for the development of more advanced carrier operations, eventually leading to the large, modern aircraft carriers used by navies around the world today.
Tafas massacre, 27th September 1918
The Tafas massacre, which occurred on the 27th September 1918, was a tragic event in the history of the region now known as Syria.
This massacre took place in the town of Tafas, located in the Daraa Governorate, in southern Syria.
It was a pivotal moment during the final stages of the First World War, as the Ottoman Empire was collapsing and the British-led Allied forces were advancing through the Levant, including the southern territories of Ottoman Syria.
At the time, the town of Tafas was predominantly inhabited by Arabs, many of whom had supported the Arab Revolt against Ottoman rule.
The massacre was a result of tensions between the local population and the retreating Ottoman forces.
...troops and local collaborators retaliated against the people of Tafas...
As the Ottomans were losing control of their territory to the advancing Allied forces, including the British Egyptian Expeditionary Force, Ottoman troops and local collaborators retaliated against the people of Tafas, who were seen as sympathetic to the Arab nationalists.
On September 27, the Ottoman forces, in an act of brutal repression, massacred many of the town's residents, including men, women, and children.
The exact number of victims is unclear, but estimates suggest that hundreds of people were killed in the attack.
The massacre included widespread executions and the destruction of homes, leaving the town in ruins.
It was one of several such reprisals conducted by the retreating Ottoman forces as they sought to maintain control over territories that were slipping from their grasp.
...the larger pattern of violence and reprisals...
The Tafas massacre was part of the larger pattern of violence and reprisals that marked the final days of the Ottoman Empire’s control over the Levant.
It highlighted the complex dynamics of local resistance to Ottoman rule and the extreme measures taken by the empire to crush any form of rebellion as it collapsed in the face of Allied and Arab forces.
This tragic event is remembered as one of the many atrocities that occurred during this tumultuous period in the history of the Middle East.
Radomir Rebellion, 28th September 1918
The Radomir Rebellion, which unfolded in late September 1918, was a key episode in Bulgaria’s tumultuous exit from the First World War.
Sparked by widespread dissatisfaction with the government and the hardships imposed by the war, the rebellion was led by disillusioned soldiers and peasants, supported by elements of the Bulgarian Agrarian National Union (BANU) and other leftist factions.
The revolt marked an attempt to overthrow the monarchy and establish a republic in Bulgaria.
By 1918, Bulgaria was facing immense internal strain. Years of military involvement in the war had exhausted the nation’s resources, while food shortages, inflation, and high casualties bred resentment among soldiers and civilians alike.
...soldiers began deserting in large numbers...
This unrest boiled over after the Allied offensive at the Battle of Dobro Pole in September 1918, which dealt a devastating blow to the Bulgarian army.
Demoralized and unwilling to continue fighting, soldiers began deserting in large numbers and marching back toward their homeland.
The rebellion began on September 27, when mutinous troops seized the town of Radomir, about 50 kilometers south of Sofia, and declared the establishment of a Bulgarian republic.
Led by BANU leader Aleksandar Stamboliyski, a vocal critic of the monarchy and the war, the rebels sought to overthrow Tsar Ferdinand I and institute a government that represented the interests of workers and peasants.
...quickly mobilized to suppress the uprising...
However, the rebellion was short-lived. Royalist forces, still loyal to the monarchy, quickly mobilized to suppress the uprising.
By the 30th September, the rebellion had been crushed, with significant casualties on both sides. Stamboliyski was arrested but would later rise to prominence as Bulgaria’s prime minister.
The Radomir Rebellion reflected the deep societal divisions and discontent that characterized Bulgaria during the war.
It also signaled the beginning of the end for Tsar Ferdinand, who abdicated in October 1918, paving the way for political reform.
Hitler avoids death, 28th September 1918
On the 28th 1918, an event occurred during World War I that would become part of the war's lore, though the details remain unclear.
Private Henry Tandey, a British soldier serving near the French village of Marcoing, reportedly encountered a wounded German soldier and chose not to shoot him, sparing the life of 29-year-old Lance Corporal Adolf Hitler.
Tandey, a native of Warwickshire, had fought in several major battles during the war, including the First Battle of Ypres in 1914 and the Battle of the Somme in 1916, where he was injured.
After recovering from his injuries, he was reassigned to the 9th Battalion and again wounded during the Third Battle of Ypres in 1917.
...a wounded soldier appeared in his line of fire...
By 1918, he was serving with the 5th Duke of Wellington Regiment, and it was during this period that he took part in the successful British capture of Marcoing, for which he was awarded the Victoria Cross for his bravery.
Tandey later recounted the moment when, during the retreat of German forces, a wounded soldier appeared in his line of fire.
He recalled, "I took aim but couldn’t shoot a wounded man, so I let him go." The German soldier nodded in gratitude and vanished.
...That’s the man who nearly shot me...
While there is no conclusive evidence to confirm that Hitler was the soldier Tandey spared, there is a compelling link.
A photograph of Tandey carrying a wounded soldier from 1914 was later used in a painting by Italian artist Fortunino Matania.
When British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain visited Hitler in 1938, the Führer showed him a copy of this painting, remarking, "That’s the man who nearly shot me."
...his wartime experiences had shaped his ideology...
The authenticity of the encounter remains disputed, but it is clear that Hitler, who had been decorated for bravery during the war, retained a deep connection to the experience.
In 1941, after leading Germany into another devastating war, Hitler acknowledged that his wartime experiences had shaped his ideology:
"When I returned from the War, I brought back home with me my experiences at the front; out of them I built my National Socialist community."
Bulgaria signs the Armistice of Salonica, 29th September 1918
On the 29th September 1918, Bulgaria signed an armistice with the Allied powers, marking a significant turning point in the First World War.
The signing of the armistice was the culmination of a series of military defeats and political turmoil that led to Bulgaria’s withdrawal from the Central Powers alliance, which had included Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire.
By the summer of 1918, the military situation for Bulgaria had become increasingly dire. The Allies, particularly the Serbian, French, and British forces, had made substantial progress on the Macedonian front.
The Bulgarian army, exhausted and demoralized, was unable to withstand the combined pressure from the Allied forces.
...left the country in a vulnerable position...
The breakthrough by the Allies in the Battle of Dobro Pole in mid-September 1918, which saw Bulgarian forces decisively defeated, left the country in a vulnerable position.
Bulgarian troops were retreating rapidly, and there was widespread discontent among the population due to the economic strain caused by the war.
The Bulgarian government, realizing the inevitability of defeat, sought to negotiate a ceasefire with the Allies.
The Bulgarian delegates at the armistice negotiations: Major General Ivan Lukov, Andrey Lyapchev and Simeon Radev. The negotiations for the Armistice of Salonica in September 1918 were led by Bulgarian General Ivan Lukov and conducted under urgent conditions as Bulgaria faced military defeat. The Allies, represented by French General Franchet d’Espèrey, imposed strict terms, including disarmament and occupation. Lacking leverage, the Bulgarian delegation had little choice but to accept.
...terms of the armistice were harsh...
The armistice was signed at the village of Salonica (modern-day Thessaloniki) in Greece, where the headquarters of the Allied forces on the Macedonian front were located.
The terms of the armistice were harsh for Bulgaria, as they had to agree to the demobilization of their army, the occupation of strategic territories, and the surrender of military equipment to the Allies.
Additionally, Bulgaria was required to open its borders to allow the movement of Allied troops, effectively ending its participation in the war.
The official terms of the armistice with Bulgaria. The Bulgarian Armistice of 1918, signed on the 29th September in Salonica, ended Bulgaria’s participation in the First World War. It required the demobilization of the Bulgarian Army, Allied occupation of key territories, and surrender of military equipment. The armistice paved the way for Bulgaria’s eventual peace settlement in the Treaty of Neuilly-sur-Seine.
...signaled the collapse of Bulgaria’s role in the Balkan region...
The signing of the armistice with Bulgaria had significant consequences for the wider conflict.
It effectively removed one of the Central Powers from the war, allowing the Allies to focus their resources on the remaining Central Powers, particularly Germany.
It also signaled the collapse of Bulgaria’s role in the Balkan region and paved the way for the post-war reorganization of Southeast Europe.
The armistice also set the stage for the Treaty of Neuilly-sur-Seine, signed in 1919, which imposed harsh peace terms on Bulgaria, including territorial losses and reparations, significantly reshaping the political landscape of the Balkans.
Conclusion
The events of September 1918 had profound and lasting consequences on political developments in the 1920s and 1930s, shaping the trajectory toward the Second World War.
The Red Terror and the rise of the Revolutionary Military Council solidified Bolshevik control in Soviet Russia, paving the way for the establishment of a totalitarian regime under Lenin and later Stalin.
This centralization of power and the creation of a repressive state apparatus would inspire similar movements across Europe, contributing to the rise of fascism and the eventual outbreak of the Second World War.
...marked the disintegration of the Central Powers...
The collapse of Bulgaria and the signing of the armistice also marked the disintegration of the Central Powers and led to territorial and political shifts in the Balkans.
The harsh terms of the Treaty of Neuilly, combined with political instability, contributed to rising nationalism and resentment, particularly in Bulgaria.
This discontent fueled the rise of authoritarian leaders, such as King Boris III, and created an environment ripe for the influence of Nazi Germany.
...laying the groundwork for future territorial disputes and tensions...
The massacre in Baku and the weakening of empires in the Middle East further contributed to regional instability, with interethnic conflict and the fragmentation of Ottoman territories laying the groundwork for future territorial disputes and tensions.
Meanwhile, the impact of the First World War, exemplified by the Battle of Saint-Mihiel and the Vardar Offensive, demonstrated the military shifts in the balance of power and the importance of new technologies and tactics, all of which would shape the strategy and alliances of the Second World War.
Together, these events set the stage for the political and military tensions that would erupt in the 1930s and lead to global conflict.
Further Reading
Eric W. Osborne’s The Battle of Megiddo, Palestine 1918: Combined Arms and the Last Great Cavalry Charge examines the decisive First World War battle where British and Allied forces, led by General Edmund Allenby, crushed Ottoman defenses. The book highlights the innovative use of combined arms—cavalry, infantry, and air power—demonstrating modern warfare’s evolution. Osborne details strategic maneuvers, the battle’s impact on the Middle East, and its role in hastening the Ottoman Empire’s collapse.
Ronald Grigor Suny's The Baku Commune, 1917-1918 explores the brief but significant socialist experiment in Baku during the Russian Revolution. It examines the complex interplay of class, nationality, and politics as Bolsheviks, Mensheviks, Dashnaks, and local ethnic groups struggled for power. The book highlights how economic interests, ethnic tensions, and external interventions shaped the commune’s fate, ultimately leading to its downfall when the Ottoman-backed Azerbaijani nationalists seized control in 1918.
Colourisers
