Far-right politics is back—with sharper suits, louder microphones, and disturbingly familiar rhetoric. Across the globe, nationalism, scapegoating, and authoritarianism are on the rise. Is this a new era of extremism or a grim echo of the 1930s? Either way, history isn’t just whispering—it’s shouting.
And we’d better listen.
You’d think we’d have learned by now.
After all, the 20th century gave us a crash course in how not to run a planet. Two world wars, countless genocides, gulags, purges, and one particularly infamous Austrian with a toothbrush moustache—surely that would be enough of a cautionary tale.
But, apparently, fascism just needed a rebrand. Now it’s back, with slicker suits, better social media strategy, and—crucially—a lot of people pretending not to notice.
Across the globe, far-right politics is not just resurgent—it’s thriving. In democracies large and small, the language of division, nationalism, and strongman populism is seeping back into mainstream discourse like damp into a crumbling wall.
So the question must be asked: are we witnessing a tragic historical rerun, or is this simply the grotesque pantomime of democracy at work?
Spoiler alert: it’s probably both.
Fascism with Filters: A New Face, Same Old Rot
Let’s get one thing straight. Today’s far-right doesn’t always arrive goose-stepping down the street in jackboots—though some still do, for old times’ sake.
Instead, they’re in parliament, on cable news, or grinning over a podcast mic.
The suits are sharper, the language is coded, and the targets have shifted—though not by much.
Jews, Muslims, immigrants, refugees, LGBTQ+ people, Transgender, academics, journalists—the scapegoats are still plentiful.
All that’s changed is the algorithm.
In Italy, Giorgia Meloni ascended to power riding a wave of anti-immigrant sentiment, ultra-conservative values, and a disturbingly open nostalgia for Mussolini’s ideology.
Her party’s roots aren’t just tinged with fascism—they are fascist. Not figuratively. Literally.
Meanwhile, in Hungary, Viktor Orbán has methodically dismantled the foundations of liberal democracy, proudly declaring his regime “illiberal” as if authoritarianism were simply a bold lifestyle choice.
He has muzzled the press, warped the judiciary, vilified migrants, and draped nationalism in the flag of patriotism—eerily familiar tactics with an updated wardrobe.
In India, Narendra Modi’s government has embraced Hindu nationalism with a fervour that borders on theocratic.
Minority rights, particularly those of Muslims, are being eroded at an alarming pace, as his Bharatiya Janata Party perfects the fine art of exclusionary politics wrapped in cultural pride.
Across the Atlantic in Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency played out like a fever dream of denialism and strongman cosplay—peppered with misogyny, environmental vandalism, and a not-so-subtle longing for the country’s military dictatorship of the 20th century.
And then, of course, there’s the United States. The MAGA movement, led by a man who once claimed he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue without consequence, has done more to destabilise democratic norms than any external threat in recent memory.
The January 6th Capitol insurrection wasn’t a mere outburst—it was a self-broadcasted, red-capped trial run for something far more sinister. Democracy, it turns out, is increasingly fragile—even where it once appeared invincible.
These are not fringe figures.
These are heads of state, leading parties, and contenders for power in some of the world’s most influential democracies.
The same toxic cocktail—national grievance, economic fear, racial resentment, and a longing for “simpler times”—is being served up across continents.
All it’s missing is a swastika.
Comparisons with 1930s Europe: Tired, But Not Wrong
Critics argue that comparing today’s far-right movements to Nazi Germany is alarmist, reductive, or just lazy. But while historical comparisons must always be nuanced, we ignore the parallels at our peril.
Let’s go back a century.
Post-WWI Germany was humiliated, economically devastated, and politically unstable.
Along came Adolf Hitler, a charismatic nobody with a talent for oratory and an uncanny ability to channel national despair into blind fury.
The Nazi Party promised pride, prosperity, and purity. Within a decade, they turned a democracy into a death machine.
Now let’s transpose that to today.
The post-2008 economic crisis, the global refugee influx, growing inequality, and the existential disorientation brought on by globalization and digital life have created fertile ground for a new generation of demagogues.
Like Hitler, they offer certainty in uncertain times.
They scapegoat minorities, dismiss dissent, and promise a return to national greatness. They thrive on fear and feast on division.
Is it the same? Of course not. History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes—and right now, it’s humming a disturbingly familiar tune.
Origins of the New Authoritarianism: Fear, Fury, and Facebook
So how did we get here?
The short answer: slowly, then all at once.
After the Cold War, there was a widespread (and embarrassingly premature) belief that liberal democracy had triumphed. Francis Fukuyama declared the “end of history,” and the West fell into a complacent stupor. While we were busy congratulating ourselves, the world was changing.
The roots of today’s far-right resurgence lie in a tangled mass of fear, fury, and frustration—and it all began, in part, with economic anxiety. As globalization swept across the world, traditional industries were hollowed out, jobs evaporated, and entire towns slipped into quiet decay.
Inequality ballooned while governments, instead of offering solutions, handed out something called “austerity”—a stiff, suit-wearing euphemism for “you’re on your own.”
Into this bleak vacuum marched the populists, waving flags, promising jobs, and whispering sweet nothings about restoring dignity to “the forgotten man.” You know the type.
They usually want to Make Something Great Again.
But it wasn’t just economic loss—it was cultural dislocation.
As society made strides in racial justice, gender equality, and LGBTQ+ rights, a significant portion of the population, particularly older white men, began to feel unmoored.
The world they knew was changing too fast, becoming too unfamiliar.
The far right pounced on this unease, rebranding progress as peril and selling themselves as noble defenders of “traditional values” under siege from so-called “woke tyranny.”
It’s a well-worn script.
Hitler, too, fancied himself a guardian of German culture against moral and racial “degeneracy.”
And always, always, there is the outsider—the immigrant, the refugee, the Other. Few things energise far-right movements more than the invented threat of the foreigner.
Whether it's Syrian refugees, Mexican migrants, Muslim communities, or Roma travellers, the formula remains the same: turn human suffering into a menace.
Whip up fear.
Stoke hatred.
Stir in a bit of identity panic, and voilà—you’ve got yourself a cause.
The slogans are tired, but effective: “We must protect our borders, our culture, our women.” It worked in 1933.
It still works—only now, it’s retweeted instead of shouted.
And in this era, no analysis would be complete without the foul breath of social media swirling through it all.
Once envisioned as a utopia of free speech and connection, platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and the artist formerly known as Twitter (now X, because apparently we’re all in a dystopian rebrand) have become algorithmic accelerants for extremism.
Echo chambers reinforce paranoia.
Hate speech goes viral.
Conspiracy theories metastasise before facts can catch up.
And nuance?
Nuance was last seen curled up in a corner, sobbing into a pile of discarded terms of service.
This isn’t just the public square—it’s a digital battleground, and the far right is fighting with flame-throwers.
In the 1930s, it took years to radicalise a population. Now it takes fifteen seconds and a meme.
The Cult of the Strongman
One defining feature of the modern far right is its fetishisation of strength. Liberal democracy is painted as weak, indecisive, and emasculated.
Enter the strongman—shirtless on a horse, punching down at minorities, declaring war on facts.
This isn’t just political branding—it’s myth-making.
The leader becomes a symbol, a saviour, a father figure.
Whether it’s Putin’s macho posturing, Trump’s playground taunts, or Modi’s “56-inch chest,” the far right knows the value of personality cults.
History, again, obliges us to remember: when leaders demand loyalty to themselves over institutions, when they claim to speak for “the people” while silencing dissent, and when they frame themselves as the only barrier between order and chaos… dictatorships are not far behind.
The Media, the Masses, and the Mute Majority
A key component of the far right’s rise is not just who supports them—but who doesn’t resist them.
The media, under the guise of “balance,” often gives far-right figures a platform while refusing to call them what they are. “Populist,” “controversial,” “firebrand”—all euphemisms that help sanitise extremism.
Imagine 1933 BBC headlines: “Chancellor Hitler Discusses Concerns Over International Jewry—Opposition Calls for Calm.”
Meanwhile, the majority of people—well-meaning, moderate, busy—do nothing.
They hope the fever will pass.
They think the system will hold.
They tell themselves that “it can’t happen here.”
But it can. It already is.
In Weimar Germany, ordinary people shrugged. Then they marched.
Then they were marched.
So, What Now?
Is it too late? Not yet. But history gives us no comfort.
Democracy does not die in a coup—it dies in increments. A law here. A crackdown there. A judiciary reshuffled. A journalist jailed. A protest banned. A minority vilified. A truth denied.
And suddenly, you're not in a democracy anymore.
If we are to resist this tide, we need more than outrage—we need vigilance.
We must call things by their names.
We must challenge lies.
We must defend pluralism, even when it’s messy.
We must remember that democracy is not just voting every few years—it’s protecting the rights of those who lose.
Because the far right doesn’t come to power by breaking the rules. It comes by rewriting them.
Conclusion: Echoes and Alarms
History is not destiny, but it is a mirror. When we look into it now, we should feel a chill.
We’ve seen this story before—the swelling nationalism, the scapegoating, the promises of rebirth, the slow strangling of dissent.
Last time, the world had to burn before we woke up.
This time, we have no excuse. We know how it starts. We even know how it ends.
The question is whether we’ll stop applauding the strongmen long enough to do something about it.
Because fascism doesn’t knock—it walks right in, cheered by those who should know better, and ignored by those who never believed it could happen again.
And here we are.
Article created and edited by Warmaster
Add comment
Comments